The Vendor is required to provide audit firm government services for three consecutive fiscal years beginning with the fiscal year ended 12-31-25, and ending with the fiscal year ended 12-31-27, subject to annual review and the annual availability of an appropriation for audit services by the government entity.
- Objectives:
• To determine whether the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows, thereof [and the respective budgetary comparison for the (indicate the major governmental funds involved)] in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the country.
• To determine whether the combining and individual non major fund financial statements are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
• To determine whether the financial statements presented as supplementary information present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of each of the government’s non major governmental, non-major enterprise, internal service, and fiduciary funds and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable, thereof in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the country.
• To obtain an understanding of the five components of internal control that is sufficient to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements whether due to error or fraud, and to design the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures.
• An audit of a government’s financial statements is based on opinion units, the auditor’s consideration of internal control in assessing the risks of material misstatement should address each opinion unit.
• The auditor should obtain a sufficient understanding by performing risk assessment procedures to (a) evaluate the design of controls and (b) determine whether they have been implemented.
• The auditor should use such knowledge to identify types of potential misstatements; consider factors that affect the risks of material misstatement; and design tests of controls, when applicable, and subsequent procedures.
• To plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements, including note disclosures, are free of material misstatement, whether caused by error or fraud, and material misstatements arising from illegal acts that have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts.
• The auditor’s responsibility to detect and report misstatements resulting from illegal acts having a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts is the same as that for misstatements caused by error or fraud.
• To provide reasonable assurance of detecting material misstatements that result from violations of provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts or other financial data significant to the audit objectives.
• To evaluate whether the government entity has taken appropriate corrective action to address findings and recommendations from previous engagements that could have a material effect on the financial statements or other financial data significant to the audit objectives.
• Auditors should use this information from previous engagements in assessing risk and determining the nature, timing, and extent of current audit work, including determining the extent to which testing the implementation of the corrective actions is applicable to the current audit objectives.
• To ensure that audit documentation is prepared in sufficient detail to provide a clear understanding of the nature, timing, and extent of auditing procedures performed to comply with generally accepted government auditing standards and other applicable standards and requirements; the results of the audit procedures performed and the audit evidence obtained; the conclusions reached on significant matters; and that the accounting records agree or reconcile with the audited financial statements.
• Auditors should also document, before the audit report is issued, evidence of supervisory review of the work performed that supports findings, conclusions, and recommendations contained in the audit report.
Set up free email alerts and get notified when new government bids, tenders and procurement opportunities match your industry and location. Choose daily or weekly delivery.